<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Comments On &#8220;The Mommy Wars&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.quotationspage.com/weblog/2006-05-08-the-comments-on-the-mommy-wars/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.quotationspage.com/weblog/2006-05-08-the-comments-on-the-mommy-wars/</link>
	<description>A weblog from the web's original quotations site.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 20:00:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pordapod</title>
		<link>https://www.quotationspage.com/weblog/2006-05-08-the-comments-on-the-mommy-wars/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>Pordapod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 00:06:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quotationspage.com/weblog/?p=389#comment-48</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Ay, I would agree that what YOU create becomes your legacy, with that in mind ponder on this. Whitman created those peoms out of his own heart and soul, Shakespeare pulled them out of the very recesses of human imagination, doesn&#039;t that, in some way, equal a birthing?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Sure, you do not need to leave any remanents of your physical DNA laying about, but don&#039;t their works leave a DNA blue print of their souls? &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So in the end, your leagcy is what is important. Creating new life biologically is easier in some respects, but harder in others. The process is easy, but the end result is a pain in the ass, but beautiful along with it. Creating new life creativly is harder in process, but the ending result is kind of nice because it is easier to manage, both end results are still enjoyable.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I am sorry that I was unclear by what I meant by &quot; no real legacy&quot;. That statement was meant to be addressed to the people who leave this world and have no following of any sort, whether it be through a biological or creative means. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Poets are parents in their own respects; their children just behave a little better is all. In the end, it is the moral or ethical values that you imprint in your work (whether it be biological or creative) that make you something to be admired. A parent who teaches his child nothing of the world or it&#039;s hardships, is not to be reveled over a lone writer who tell the truths of this world. But a parent who teaches his child the truths of the world, that the child becomes the one who is the writer, should be respected as the childs works will be.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Greatness is relative to each person however. What I think to be great, many people could disagree with. All that I ask of anyone who demands my respect is that they show me their works when they leave this world, that I may see their worth through an indirect refrence to their soul. For our souls are what is judged in the end, not our bodies, not our minds, not even our lives... just our souls.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ay, I would agree that what YOU create becomes your legacy, with that in mind ponder on this. Whitman created those peoms out of his own heart and soul, Shakespeare pulled them out of the very recesses of human imagination, doesn&#8217;t that, in some way, equal a birthing?</p>

<p>Sure, you do not need to leave any remanents of your physical DNA laying about, but don&#8217;t their works leave a DNA blue print of their souls? </p>

<p>So in the end, your leagcy is what is important. Creating new life biologically is easier in some respects, but harder in others. The process is easy, but the end result is a pain in the ass, but beautiful along with it. Creating new life creativly is harder in process, but the ending result is kind of nice because it is easier to manage, both end results are still enjoyable.</p>

<p>I am sorry that I was unclear by what I meant by &#8221; no real legacy&#8221;. That statement was meant to be addressed to the people who leave this world and have no following of any sort, whether it be through a biological or creative means. </p>

<p>Poets are parents in their own respects; their children just behave a little better is all. In the end, it is the moral or ethical values that you imprint in your work (whether it be biological or creative) that make you something to be admired. A parent who teaches his child nothing of the world or it&#8217;s hardships, is not to be reveled over a lone writer who tell the truths of this world. But a parent who teaches his child the truths of the world, that the child becomes the one who is the writer, should be respected as the childs works will be.</p>

<p>Greatness is relative to each person however. What I think to be great, many people could disagree with. All that I ask of anyone who demands my respect is that they show me their works when they leave this world, that I may see their worth through an indirect refrence to their soul. For our souls are what is judged in the end, not our bodies, not our minds, not even our lives&#8230; just our souls.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
