<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Criminal Minds, Part 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.quotationspage.com/weblog/2006-03-22-criminal-minds-part-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.quotationspage.com/weblog/2006-03-22-criminal-minds-part-2/</link>
	<description>A weblog from the web's original quotations site.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 20:00:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: gio_bleaux</title>
		<link>https://www.quotationspage.com/weblog/2006-03-22-criminal-minds-part-2/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>gio_bleaux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 12:09:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quotationspage.com/weblog/?p=367#comment-44</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Your reference to &quot;â€¦when you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.&quot; as coming from Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, (Sherlock Holmes) is not totally correct. Doyle was referring to what is  known as Occam&#039;s razor, which according to the Wikipedia encyclopedia &quot;is a principle attributed to the 14th-century English logician and Franciscan friar William of Ockham.&quot; It goes on to state: &quot;...that the explanation of phenomenon should make as few assumptions as possible, eliminating those that make no difference in the observable predictions of the explantory hypothesis or theory.&quot; Or in other words, after you&#039;ve eliminated everything else, the answer/truth is what remains.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your reference to &#8220;â€¦when you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.&#8221; as coming from Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, (Sherlock Holmes) is not totally correct. Doyle was referring to what is  known as Occam&#8217;s razor, which according to the Wikipedia encyclopedia &#8220;is a principle attributed to the 14th-century English logician and Franciscan friar William of Ockham.&#8221; It goes on to state: &#8220;&#8230;that the explanation of phenomenon should make as few assumptions as possible, eliminating those that make no difference in the observable predictions of the explantory hypothesis or theory.&#8221; Or in other words, after you&#8217;ve eliminated everything else, the answer/truth is what remains.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
