Quotations and Literature Forum

It is currently Wed Apr 16, 2014 3:27 am

All times are UTC - 7 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2004 2:59 am 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2003 10:32 am
Posts: 24
"We are focus-points of consciousness," I said, "enormously creative. When we enter the self-constructed hologrammatic arena we call spacetime, we begin at once to generate creativity particles, imajons, in violent continuous pyrotechnic deluge. Imajons have no charge of their own but are strongly polarized through our attitudes and by the force of our choice and desire into clouds of conceptons, a family of very-high-energy particles which may be positive, negative or neutral. "Some common positive conceptons are exhilarons, excytons, rhapsodons, jovions. Common negative conceptons include gloomons, tormentons, tribulons, agonons, miserons.

"Indefinite number of conceptons are created in nonstop eruption, a thundering cascade of creativity pouring from every centre of personal consciousness. They mushroom into concepton clouds, which can be neutral or strongly charged - buoyant, weightless or leaden, depending upon the nature of their dominant particles.

"Every nanosecond, an indefinite number of concepton clouds build to critical mass, then transform in quantum bursts to high energy probability waves radiating at tachyon speeds through an eternal reservoir of supersaturated alternate events. Depending on their charge and nature, the probability waves crystallize certain of these potential events to match the mental polarity of their creating consciousness into holographic appearance.

"The materialized events become that mind's experience, freighted with all the aspects of physical structure necessary to make them real and learningful to the creating consciousness. This autonomic process is the fountain from which springs every object and event in the theatre of spacetime.

"The pursuasion of the imajon hypothesis lies in its capacity for personal verification. The hypothesis predicts that as we focus our conscious intention on the positive and life-affirming, as we fasten our thoughts on these values, we polarize masses of positive conceptons, realize beneficial probability waves, bring useful alternate events to us that otherwise would not have appeared to exist.

"The reverse is true in the production of negative events, as is the mediocre in-between. Through default or intention, unaware or by design, we not only choose but create the visible outer conditions that are most resonant to our inner state of being.

"The end."
-- Richard Bach, _Running from Safety_

***

-

much love, light and laughter,
ananya.

_________________
~*Blowing out someone else's candle doesn't make your's burn any brighter.*~


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 12, 2004 8:20 pm 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 8:09 pm
Posts: 28
Very true!! And when this view is compounded with directed actions and the encouraged positive volitions of all in a community of souls the potential is unlimited.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 10, 2005 7:14 pm 
Offline
QuoteMaster
QuoteMaster

Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2004 1:33 am
Posts: 519
Why not just say that if we work together we move forward ? :?

Complexity of language does not add value to the principle it describes.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 10, 2005 8:58 pm 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 8:09 pm
Posts: 28
But accurracy does. There is art in simplicity but not all simplicity is art or truth. Recheck and you will see that your statement is not quite to the point I made and is not actually correct. Working together is not always productive and when collectives work towards the wrong goals are often counterproductive. Activity and motion are not always achievement. On the otherhand cooperation does enhance potential even if the potential is never realized.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 11, 2005 2:51 am 
Offline
QuoteMaster
QuoteMaster

Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2004 1:33 am
Posts: 519
You recheck. Just because a collective group is present does not mean that they work together. " Working together " means that the individuals share a common focus and this will lead to productivity, always. Activity and motion don't have anything to do with achievement, purpose does.

Who are you trying to impress with this bogus rhetoric you use.
Speak plainly. Whyshould the reader have to decipher what you say ?

(There is art in simplicity but not all simplicity is art or truth. ) This is a nonsense statement. There is no art in simplicity _ Simplicity is an art. Becareful who you learn from. If your teacher is an idiot he will make you a fool. Why do you write this way ? :?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 11, 2005 5:26 pm 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 8:09 pm
Posts: 28
You really should put a lot more thought into what you say. Simplicity, or anything else is not always art;unless you get off on meaningless statements about art always being art and water always beind watery.

People working together with focus do not always produce anything beyond focus, which is not desireable if it accomp[lishes nothing else or detracts from the purpose they were working together to achieve.

I certainly never said that because a collective was present they were working together. This is ONE of the reasons you would gain by recheckig rather than making misdirected statements. Working together often produces nothing other than unified effort. This is NOT the same as being productive unless the effort alone was what they desired or some lucky benefit just happens to come from it.

You should be very careful who you are learning your views from if you think simplicity at the expense of accuracy is laudable or that a group focused to no other gain is productive or that impressing others is everyone's goal. If you realy believe your statement that simplicity is an art but there is no art in simplicity(artless art) you really should check yourself before making simple errors like that. If YOUR goal was to impress, as you attribute to others, you need to gain a better understanding of what constitutes a nonsense statement and stop making them.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 11, 2005 7:33 pm 
Offline
QuoteMaster
QuoteMaster

Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2004 1:33 am
Posts: 519
Ok, I am just gonna say this. It doesn't really seem that we disagree here but we are speaking a bit of a different language.

I said simplicity is an art.

Art _ (the conscious use of skill and creative imagination especially in the production of aesthetic objects. )

By that I am saying it takes skill to make things simple and easy to understand without compromising integrity. Some things are simple but also lack relevance. The art of simplicity requires one to chop away any portion that is not absolutely necessary until only the essence remains.

In my "opinion" your writing, accurate as it may be, seems overly complicated and complex, not intended for the average reader. Maybe that is intentional, I don't know.

Language is a tool used to communicate ideas and concepts between minds. To do this effectively we must each be sure to select words whose meanings are clear to us and to the intended reader or listener. Common words can describe concepts and principles just as well as any other. If one can use common language to explain complex subjects you do a greater service to mankind making it more inclusive.

To use complicated coded verbiage to address the simplest of things only works to alienate others causing all sorts of prejudice and bigotry.

This is the art of simplisity.

The End.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: .
PostPosted: Fri Jan 14, 2005 7:24 pm 
Offline
New member
New member

Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 7:09 pm
Posts: 6
Location: Constantly shifting.
I understood and agree with the fact that we not only choose but create our own lives.But:
Read it once, and it looks like a scientific theory.
Read it one more time, and you begin to get a general idea of it.
Read it starting from the last sentence, and you understand it.
You should not have to do all that to understand a quote. Try simlifying it.

_________________
Go Go Go Go Go Go Go
Go Go Go
Go Go Go
Go Go Go Go Go Go
Go Go Go Go
Go Go Go Go Go Go Go


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 14, 2005 10:10 pm 
Offline
QuoteMaster
QuoteMaster

Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2004 1:33 am
Posts: 519
Way to go ( Who can say )


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 7 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group